Recode is a trusted source for everything tech.
Subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Play, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Read the original article from Recode: How to Find the Perfect Product, No Matter What.
Recode is a trusted source for everything tech.
Subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Play, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Read the original article from Recode: How to Find the Perfect Product, No Matter What.
Analysts say that the president’s decision to name former FBI Director Robert Mueller as special counsel for Russia is intended to undermine his efforts to find a way to investigate the Russia collusion matter.
Trump’s announcement, on Thursday, was made without the involvement of any of the congressional committees that oversee investigations of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
The Senate intelligence committee is already investigating the matter.
It’s unclear how Trump will respond to Mueller’s nomination, but analysts say it’s not an unreasonable decision given the special counsel’s reputation for integrity and credibility.
Trump has been in the spotlight for his Russia ties since a dossier compiled by a former British spy was published by Buzzfeed.
The dossier, which cited the president as a source, was highly damaging to his candidacy and helped make him the first president in more than a quarter-century to be charged with obstruction of justice.
A month before Trump’s inauguration, the House Intelligence Committee approved a bill that would expand Mueller’s scope to investigate “all aspects of Russian involvement in the U.S. political process” and the potential for collusion with the Trump campaign.
But that effort has not yet moved forward.
Some Democrats have called for Mueller’s removal from the Russia investigation and called on the president to publicly confirm that the special investigation is still going.
The president did not address the issue at Thursday’s White House briefing.
The White House declined to comment on whether Trump will appoint a special counsel to oversee the Russia probe, saying only that the matter is currently under investigation by the Justice Department and that “the president has the full confidence of Attorney General Jeff Sessions.”
The special counsel has also faced scrutiny in Congress over a memo he wrote in December detailing his assessment of whether Trump was “honest and trustworthy” in the Russia inquiry.
It was not immediately clear if Trump would use the memo to undermine the Russia investigations.
Mueller is known for his close relationship with the president, who has publicly praised him for his work.
In January, Trump praised Mueller for “a lot of work he’s done” and “he’s done a really good job” in his investigation.
Analysis of climate data is important, especially when it comes to predictions of how climate events will unfold.
However, it is often difficult to compare climate models with climate observations, and this article will help you identify data that can be used to predict what will happen if the planet is warmed significantly.
There are several different kinds of data that are used to analyze climate change: meteorological data, oceanic data, and atmospheric data.
Meteorological data can be obtained by monitoring the distribution of precipitation over the globe.
Weather stations around the world record these measurements, and can be useful for predicting precipitation patterns.
Oceanic data is gathered by satellite data, which is collected by ships that track the movements of the ocean and other oceanic objects.
Atmospheric data is the information that is generated when atmospheric pressure changes.
This data can provide information on how much heat is trapped in the atmosphere and what it means for the temperature of the Earth.
As you can see, meteorological and oceanic datasets are used a lot in climate modeling.
Meteorological data is usually collected by land based weather stations, while oceanic is collected from aircraft.
The differences between these types of data can lead to different predictions of what will occur in the future.
Meteorologists can obtain weather stations by surveying weather data collected by aircraft and then by observing them during the day.
In some instances, a weather station will be monitoring the weather on a particular day, while an aircraft will be collecting weather data during the same day.
These observations can then be used as a baseline for a prediction.
Weather station data is collected on the same days of the year as weather observations, so a meteorologist can compare the observations and the predictions made on different days of a year.
Oceanographic data can also be obtained from land based stations and aircraft, and weather station data can usually be compared with oceanographic data.
The most common meteorological observations are from weather stations.
A weather station collects data from the surface of the earth, which consists of water vapor, gases and ice.
When atmospheric pressure rises, the water vapor condenses on the surface, forming clouds.
As clouds form, they create a pattern of clouds that can provide some indication of the weather patterns around the globe and can also give us a general idea of the temperature and humidity in the air.
As the temperature rises, clouds become denser, making them appear more like snow.
This gives us a measure of the amount of snowfall that is being produced in the earth’s atmosphere.
Weather data can then provide us with an estimate of how much water vapor will be present in the sky.
It is this information that meteorologists use to forecast the weather in the coming days.
Meteosat is a weather data system that is operated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Its purpose is to collect meteorological information.
The data is stored on a number of different types of storage mediums, which include magnetic tapes, optical disks, CD-ROMs, and hard disks.
Metesat also uses a number-crunching algorithm to extract weather data from meteorological records.
The algorithm uses a technique called Monte Carlo Simulation to generate an estimate from a dataset.
Monte Carlo simulation can be done in many ways.
For instance, it can be applied to analyzing data that has been collected in a way that gives an error.
However with this method, there is a finite amount of data to process.
There is no way to determine the number of observations that have to be processed before the results can be considered accurate.
Meters also are used for climate model predictions.
These are data that have been collected by scientists that are trained to work with climate data.
These scientists then compare the data with their own climate models.
This comparison helps to refine the climate model to give a better understanding of what the future will be like.
For example, if there is significant warming of the planet, then it will be very important for climate models to forecast this warming.
This is because models have to predict the changes in temperature and rainfall that occur as a result of this warming, and the warming itself will have a significant impact on the amount and type of rainfall that will occur.
Metresat also collects data about the distribution and distribution of clouds in the climate system.
This information can be very useful when trying to predict how climate change will play out.
This kind of data is called cloud data.
When clouds form on the earth in the summertime, this can provide a forecast of the future rainfall and temperature.
The cloud data also can provide useful information on the size and structure of clouds.
Meteorologist are also able to use this information to forecast how severe an event will be in the near future.
In order to predict future events, meteorologists often use various types of models.
Some of these models are known as climate models, which are used in forecasting climate events.
These models use observations and computer models to simulate the weather over the past.
In addition to weather data, there are
The world is being gripped by the world’s largest condom company.
The International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) is suing the world-famous manufacturer, Osprey.
Osprey was recently discovered to be selling fake, unlicensed, and non-medical condoms, according to the New York Times.
In the US, the New England Journal of Medicine reported that more than 3,400 of Ospreys condoms have been detected at a total of 3,068 sites across the country.
Ospremies condoms have also been found at the homes of over 30 women.
The FDA has confirmed that more Ospreses condoms have come into contact with the human body than any other brand.
Omgrex, O’Reilly, and other companies have also come under scrutiny in Europe for selling condoms that are unlicensed and nonmedical, which makes sense given the vast differences in quality of their products.
As more and more people around the world come to rely on Ospreys condoms, Omgreys should be held accountable.
For the sake of consumers, consumers, and our health, we have to make sure Ospreen condoms are safe, reliable, and legal.
We also have to stop Osprex from selling condoms to unsuspecting women.
As we know, the World Health Organization (WHO) recently warned against the risks of using Ospriters condoms in developing countries, which are at high risk of HIV infection and other health problems.
Despite the warnings, Omremes condoms continue to be sold in developing nations and are still sold in the US.
So if you’re a condom consumer and want to make a purchase, here’s what you need to know:Omgrex condoms are not legal in the United States.
Ospreys condom brands are illegal to sell in the USA, and are considered a product of the WHO, not the FDA.
However, they do sell to US-based pharmacies, and can be purchased online.
O’Reys condoms are also not allowed to be shipped internationally.
In the UK, O-reys is not licensed in the UK.
In Canada, Osmrey condoms are still available online and in stores, but they are not legally sold in Canada.
Omgreies condoms are now banned in China, and their products are illegal.
According to the United Nations, the WHO has estimated that the worldwide prevalence of HIV and STDs is between 10% and 15% for both men and women, and 20% for boys and girls.
Despite these statistics, many people still use O-Reys in the developed world and it is unclear how many people actually use them.
When using Omgremies, remember to always use a condom when using the condom dispenser, or when using a syringe.
Many Omgreys condoms are designed to be used as a first-time use or for people who are HIV-positive.
Oms are also available in different colors and designs to help people decide if the condom they receive is safe and effective for them.
Also, don’t forget to wash your hands after using a condom.
The best advice for condoms is to use them with a good quality condom, but remember to wash hands after use.
If you are unsure about the type of condom you received, use the condom on your skin first.
This will help reduce the chance of spreading any virus to your skin.
This article originally appeared on The Daily Dot.
How do you know if the bill will pass the House?
The answers can be found in this handy interactive chart.
Click on a line to zoom in on that line.
The charts and data below are the most recent available from the Congressional Research Service.
(You can also click the charts to enlarge.)
The bill passed the House by a vote of 217-205 on Tuesday, though it’s unclear how the legislation will be voted on in the Senate.
What does the bill do?
The bill will ban assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.
It will also expand background checks to include those buying ammunition.
It would make it easier for people who have been adjudicated as mentally ill to purchase guns.
It’d also require gun sellers to report sales of high-powered rifles to federal authorities.
It’s not clear if this bill will have any effect on how the U
President Donald Trump on Wednesday unveiled a new federal energy efficiency program aimed at reducing energy use in homes, businesses and schools.
The new proposal, titled the Smart Grid Challenge, would target states that have seen increases in energy use.
The goal of the new effort is to reduce energy consumption by 25 percent on an annual basis by 2030, with a goal of reducing energy consumption for households to 30 percent.
The federal government is also expected to create incentives to promote the use of energy-efficient lighting.
The White House did not provide specific numbers on how much of the country will be eligible to apply.
The Smart Grid Challenges will focus on three types of energy efficiency upgrades: low- and medium-income households, commercial buildings and large commercial facilities.
The $1.5 trillion program is aimed at helping consumers save money on energy bills, which has been a major challenge for many consumers.
The plan, which is expected to be unveiled during Trump’s State of the Union address on Jan. 15, is part of the administration’s effort to make sure consumers have the resources to make energy efficiency investments.
The proposal is aimed mainly at low-income families and people with disabilities, who tend to use a lot of energy to heat and cool their homes, according to the White House.
It is part-funded by a $100 billion fund that Trump announced during his presidential campaign.
The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 established a National Low-Income Energy Assistance Program to provide loans and grants to low- to moderate-income homeowners and renters, as well as low- income individuals and small businesses.
The program has expanded under the Obama administration.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is expected in the coming months to issue a rule that will set a standard for what constitutes energy efficiency, according the Energy Information Administration, the federal agency that administers the Energy Independence Act.
The rule could also provide incentive incentives to the states to develop and promote energy efficiency programs.
Google Trends has some interesting new tools to help you get an accurate picture of the amount of meat on your plate.
The latest update to the algorithm can be found in the update for the Google News app and the Google Trends app.
The update makes use of Google Trends’ accuracy and relevancy metrics, and allows users to drill down on specific articles and articles from particular countries to get a clearer picture of their accuracy.
The tool will also help you find the best content from the last two weeks, which will help you identify the most relevant content for your readers.
To use the tool, just tap on the Google search bar and hit the ‘show search results’ button.
The article will appear in the results list, and you can then scroll through the list to filter out relevant articles.
Here are some of the most useful new tools from the update: In addition to the new accuracy and relevance metrics, the update also provides a new ‘accuracy’ option in the ‘About’ section.
The ‘Accuracy’ button allows users who have read the article to get an overall score on the accuracy of the article.
You can also view the results from the article, which is also a great way to check the accuracy and usefulness of a post.
The results can be filtered by the article title, category, or keyword.
The new ‘Accurate’ option allows users with a score of 100% to filter the results based on the following criteria: article title article category article keyword The accuracy score will vary based on your article content.
The score is calculated based on articles published by a particular country or by the country’s most popular news aggregator.
A score of 80% is considered the best result.
For example, a news aggregators website in Denmark has an article with an accuracy score of 70%, but this article is a popular source for news in the United States.
The average score for a search query is a total of 5.7.
In addition, the results are also displayed on a chart, so you can see how your readers’ opinions and opinions of other sources are affected by the accuracy metrics.
Google Trends is currently only available in the US, so there are a few limitations.
However, you can sign up for a free account here to try it out for yourself.
In fact, you should try Google Trends out before you spend any money on the app, as it is still in beta.
This is a very useful tool, and it is a great source of accurate information.
Google will continue to improve the app and add new features, so make sure to keep an eye out for them.
Google News article is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 2.0.
The meme of the year: The meme that has been shared over 2 million times on Reddit and shared by more than 100,000 users.
It was first posted in December, with the caption, “There’s no such thing as a black man.”
The caption was met with a strong reaction from the Reddit community, with users commenting on how the meme was racist and insensitive.
It was followed by a similar response on Twitter.
The poster, who goes by the name of “Him”, told The Times he started the meme after hearing about the police killings of black men and women.
“This meme is not about black people being killers.
It’s about the fact that white people are the oppressors in this country,” he said.
“The only time I was aware of this meme was when the police came to my house and shot my cousin.
The meme was based on my cousin’s death.
It showed how the system works.
The memes like this are a way to show people that they are oppressed.”
The New England Patriots have had a solid offensive line for the past few years, but it was a bit of a letdown in 2015 when they lost starting right tackle Nate Solder.
The Patriots have been very active at the position this offseason, and they will have a very good option for Solder in 2016.
The 6-foot-6, 310-pounder will be looking to make a big impact this season with the Patriots.
His versatility is what makes him a great fit for the Patriots offense.
The best way to gauge the player’s ceiling is to watch tape on him, and here are some of the best offensive linemen to watch during the upcoming season.
Eric Winston, Tennessee Titans: The Titans are expected to add a quality center this offseason.
Winston was one of the biggest busts of the 2016 season with a poor season, but he still managed to make $4.5 million in 2016 and make $2.8 million in 2017.
Winston’s ceiling could be as high as $6 million annually, which is more than the next best option, Jason Kelce, who is signed through 2021.
If Winston does hit that mark, he will be one of many centers who can provide value for the Titans.
Austin Howard, Oakland Raiders: If you’re looking for a center to make an impact for you in your fantasy football league, then Austin Howard is your man.
Howard was a second-round pick out of South Carolina in 2014 and has been a Pro Bowler since.
He is a freak athlete who can run, tackle, and pass block well.
He has a very high ceiling and can be a valuable asset for you this season.
Eric Fisher, San Francisco 49ers: If there is one offensive tackle that is on your radar for the 2016-17 season, it is Eric Fisher.
The former Alabama star has been productive for the 49ers in his two seasons in San Francisco, but his career is trending downward.
Fisher has only been with the 49er for two seasons, but was released in 2018 and re-signed in 2019.
The 49ers need to get a quality tackle this offseason and Fisher is a great player to target.
Zach Strief, Miami Dolphins: Strief was a first-round selection out of Oklahoma in the 2014 NFL Draft, but had a poor 2016 season.
He struggled with injuries in 2016, but still managed $2 million in salary.
Strief is an athletic, long-armed tackle who can block, tackle for loss, and do a great job of keeping his blockers off the ball.
Jason Peters, Arizona Cardinals: Peters was a sixth-round draft pick out in 2015, but has been on a tear since then.
He was a solid starter in Arizona for two years before he was cut.
Peters has a strong arm and good pass blocking ability, and he can also play in the run game.
Peters will be the No. 1 center in fantasy football this season and could be a great value pick.
Jason Kelsey, Oakland Raider: Kelsey was a fourth-round rookie out of Arizona in 2014, and had a strong year in 2016 with $3.9 million in base salary.
Kelsey had a great 2016 season for the Raiders with $4 million in cap hit.
He also has some nice potential as a starter.
Matt Kalil, Washington Redskins: Kalil is a versatile tackle who could be on the verge of a big payday if he can find a long-term deal.
Kalil was a fifth-round compensatory pick out a season ago, but a knee injury has hampered his 2017 season.
Kalill has a lot of upside and could start for the Redskins next season, which would be an excellent way to make your roster.
Matt Paradis, New York Jets: Paradis is one of those players that can fill multiple roles in your offensive line.
The Jets will have to make decisions on what position he plays, and there are a few options on the market.
Paradis could be the guy to replace Jason Peters in your lineups.
Eric Wood, Pittsburgh Steelers: Wood is a power tackle who has been inconsistent over the past two seasons.
He made $2,854,000 in 2016 as a free agent, but struggled with injury and a foot injury.
He missed the last six games of the season with an ankle injury, but could be an upgrade to the Pittsburgh lineups in 2017 if he is able to find a new deal.
Jake Long, Chicago Bears: Long is a big body that can play tackle, guard, guard for loss and tackle for a good chunk of his career.
Long had an outstanding 2016 season, making $2.,066,000 and earning a $4,000,000 base salary for the Bears.
He could be looking for more money in the 2017 offseason.
David DeCastro, New England Belichick: De
A new paper from the Harvard-Harris poll finds that, for the first time, voters can accurately judge a candidate’s chances of winning a general election by their own judgment.
The poll shows that the average voter correctly correctly guesses the candidate’s margin of victory by about 3 percentage points, compared to the average guess for the last three presidential elections.
The accuracy rate was just under 30 percent, and was significantly better than the accuracy rate in previous presidential elections, when the candidates were all in the top 10 percent of the polls.
The authors note that their survey of 1,079 registered voters, conducted on August 6-8, shows that Clinton and Trump’s margins of victory were within 1 percentage point of each other.
This means that if you were a voter and you had the chance to guess which candidate had the best chance of winning, you would have correctly guessed that Clinton had a 56 percent chance of securing the presidency.
The margin of error for the two candidates was less than 3 percentage point, and the margin of sampling error was less over 9 percentage points.
The authors attribute this result to voters’ ability to accurately judge the likelihood of winning the election based on their own judgments, rather than relying on the accuracy of the pollsters.
They also point out that the sample size is too small to provide an accurate estimate of the accuracy, since the sample of registered voters included only people who had voted in the last two presidential elections and those who had not yet registered.